<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Kate Gregory's Blog - Office 12 and VSTO</title>
    <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/</link>
    <description>Really Good Donut</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Kate Gregory</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:58:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>kate@gregcons.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>kate@gregcons.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=39510d48-d7b0-4d82-b8bf-3d5089550ef0</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=39510d48-d7b0-4d82-b8bf-3d5089550ef0</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Here's another thing I learned when preparing
demos for a non technical crowd on Office 2010. Putting videos into PowerPoint can
actually be fun. My exposure to these was mostly at large keynotes and so on, where
the speaker would play a video and stand there kind of awkwardly while it played.
Not my thing. 
<br /><br />
Now, have you ever been at a party or get together that had a slideshow of pictures
playing? Weddings, wakes, milestone birthday parties, seems like you can almost always
spot a laptop in the corner just quietly cycling through dozens (or hundreds) of pictures.
It's actually a really nice trend. Most of the people I know do that with PowerPoint.
One picture per slide - sometimes filling the whole slide, sometimes with some text
added - and then set it up to auto advance and to repeat indefinitely. Well, if you're
going to do that, you can include videos as well. And PowerPoint has some built in
tools to let you crop (or clip) the video, fade it in and out, even display it in
a slightly more interesting layout.<br /><p></p><img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/pptvideo.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
I can see adding videos to my next slideshow using these tools. And not having to
open a second product will make it that much more likely that I'll actually do it.<br /><br />
Kate<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=39510d48-d7b0-4d82-b8bf-3d5089550ef0" /></body>
      <title>Fun with Videos in PowerPoint</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=39510d48-d7b0-4d82-b8bf-3d5089550ef0</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/FunWithVideosInPowerPoint.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:58:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Here's another thing I learned when preparing demos for a non technical crowd on Office 2010. Putting videos into PowerPoint can actually be fun. My exposure to these was mostly at large keynotes and so on, where the speaker would play a video and stand there kind of awkwardly while it played. Not my thing. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, have you ever been at a party or get together that had a slideshow of pictures
playing? Weddings, wakes, milestone birthday parties, seems like you can almost always
spot a laptop in the corner just quietly cycling through dozens (or hundreds) of pictures.
It's actually a really nice trend. Most of the people I know do that with PowerPoint.
One picture per slide - sometimes filling the whole slide, sometimes with some text
added - and then set it up to auto advance and to repeat indefinitely. Well, if you're
going to do that, you can include videos as well. And PowerPoint has some built in
tools to let you crop (or clip) the video, fade it in and out, even display it in
a slightly more interesting layout.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/pptvideo.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I can see adding videos to my next slideshow using these tools. And not having to
open a second product will make it that much more likely that I'll actually do it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Kate&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=39510d48-d7b0-4d82-b8bf-3d5089550ef0" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=9b1bee3e-0b79-4820-9615-54d96c3dba8e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=9b1bee3e-0b79-4820-9615-54d96c3dba8e</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Earlier this summer I was invited to talk
to some non technical users about Office 2010. As always happens when I am preparing
new material, I learned something. My problem is that I often learn how to do things
and then figure I'm done, I know how to do that. But software changes and sometimes
the 11 step, 3 application approach that I've learned gets superseded by a much simpler
way.<br /><br />
Here's an example: let's say you're putting together a Word document, but it's not
a requirements document or a specification or a response to an RFP. It's something
a little more personal, a little less technical. It has actual photographs in it.
Not screen shots, not a GIF exported from Visio, a photograph. You have the photograph,
but it's not quite the right size, or perhaps it's too dark, or too light. You need
to fiddle with the contrast and such. If you're a geeky person, you probably have
various apps installed on your machine that can do that. So you open the photo in
app 1, do something to it, maybe also in app 2 and do something else, and then finally
you paste the picture into Word. 
<br /><br />
Well that process is just old school. Word can do all kinds of neat stuff right from
within the app. Try it! Paste in a picture that needs some tweaking. Then select it,
and click on Picture Tools.<br /><p></p><img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/wordpic.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
You can adjust brightness and contrast with a live preview. Or try out the Artistic
Effects:<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/wordpiceffects.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
This is a lot quicker than fooling around with multiple applications, and makes this
sort of document fun.<br /><br />
Kate<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=9b1bee3e-0b79-4820-9615-54d96c3dba8e" /></body>
      <title>Tweaking Photos in Word</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=9b1bee3e-0b79-4820-9615-54d96c3dba8e</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/TweakingPhotosInWord.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Earlier this summer I was invited to talk to some non technical users about Office 2010. As always happens when I am preparing new material, I learned something. My problem is that I often learn how to do things and then figure I'm done, I know how to do that. But software changes and sometimes the 11 step, 3 application approach that I've learned gets superseded by a much simpler way.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here's an example: let's say you're putting together a Word document, but it's not
a requirements document or a specification or a response to an RFP. It's something
a little more personal, a little less technical. It has actual photographs in it.
Not screen shots, not a GIF exported from Visio, a photograph. You have the photograph,
but it's not quite the right size, or perhaps it's too dark, or too light. You need
to fiddle with the contrast and such. If you're a geeky person, you probably have
various apps installed on your machine that can do that. So you open the photo in
app 1, do something to it, maybe also in app 2 and do something else, and then finally
you paste the picture into Word. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Well that process is just old school. Word can do all kinds of neat stuff right from
within the app. Try it! Paste in a picture that needs some tweaking. Then select it,
and click on Picture Tools.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/wordpic.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You can adjust brightness and contrast with a live preview. Or try out the Artistic
Effects:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/wordpiceffects.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is a lot quicker than fooling around with multiple applications, and makes this
sort of document fun.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Kate&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=9b1bee3e-0b79-4820-9615-54d96c3dba8e" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=cbaaf52b-6db8-4dc0-9d71-465cd16125ff</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=cbaaf52b-6db8-4dc0-9d71-465cd16125ff</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
One of my pet peeves is software that thinks it's smarter than me. There are times
when software does things I wouldn't think of, without asking me, and I find that
helpful and I like it. But it can backfire. The worst offender was FrontPage, thankfully
now gone. But Outlook has an annoying little habit. It assumes that people who send
emails can't really be trusted to format them, so it "fixes" their error for you.
In other words, if I send you this plain text email:
</p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <pre>Hi,<br />
How are you doing?<br />
Call me when you can.<br />
Kate</pre>
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Outlook helpfully displays:
</p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <pre>Hi, How are you doing? Call me when you can. Kate</pre>
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Most of the time that's only a petty annoyance. But what about when my code sends:
</p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <pre>Monday 1:00<br />
Tuesday 2:30<br />
Wednesday 4:00<br />
Thursday 9:30<br />
Friday 10:00<br /></pre>
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
And you see:
</p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <pre>Monday 1:00 Tuesday 2:30 Wednesday 4:00 Thursday 9:30 Friday 10:00</pre>
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Know what happens then? I do! The user reports a bug that the emails are misformatted.
And what's more, when you tell them it's an Outlook issue and send them a screen shot
of what to click in Outlook to fix it, they don't thank you. Well, Scott Mitchell
has discovered <a href="http://scottonwriting.net/sowBlog/archive/0000/00/00/163373.aspx">what
to do in your code to make Outlook leave your ratsen-fratsen line breaks alone. </a> Just
add a space before each newline. Awesome, thanks Scott!
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=cbaaf52b-6db8-4dc0-9d71-465cd16125ff" />
      </body>
      <title>Outlook, stop stripping line breaks!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=cbaaf52b-6db8-4dc0-9d71-465cd16125ff</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/OutlookStopStrippingLineBreaks.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
One of my pet peeves is software that thinks it's smarter than me. There are times
when software does things I wouldn't think of, without asking me, and I find that
helpful and I like it. But it can backfire. The worst offender was FrontPage, thankfully
now gone. But Outlook has an annoying little habit. It assumes that people who send
emails can't really be trusted to format them, so it "fixes" their error for you.
In other words, if I send you this plain text email:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Hi,&lt;br&gt;
How are you doing?&lt;br&gt;
Call me when you can.&lt;br&gt;
Kate&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Outlook helpfully displays:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Hi, How are you doing? Call me when you can. Kate&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Most of the time that's only a petty annoyance. But what about when my code sends:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Monday 1:00&lt;br&gt;
Tuesday 2:30&lt;br&gt;
Wednesday 4:00&lt;br&gt;
Thursday 9:30&lt;br&gt;
Friday 10:00&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And you see:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Monday 1:00 Tuesday 2:30 Wednesday 4:00 Thursday 9:30 Friday 10:00&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Know what happens then? I do! The user reports a bug that the emails are misformatted.
And what's more, when you tell them it's an Outlook issue and send them a screen shot
of what to click in Outlook to fix it, they don't thank you. Well, Scott Mitchell
has discovered &lt;a href="http://scottonwriting.net/sowBlog/archive/0000/00/00/163373.aspx"&gt;what
to do in your code to make Outlook leave your ratsen-fratsen line breaks alone. &lt;/a&gt; Just
add a space before each newline. Awesome, thanks Scott!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=cbaaf52b-6db8-4dc0-9d71-465cd16125ff" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>MVP</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Office 2003</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=9af77611-04da-4b5f-9906-db5b366144b7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=9af77611-04da-4b5f-9906-db5b366144b7</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Inspired by the Visual Studio Documentary,
Rico Mariani is writing <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/tags/History+of+Visual+Studio/default.aspx">his
own history</a>. So far he's up to 8 parts and they make for great reading. He goes
into some of the technical challenges the teams faced, and talks about cancelled and
sidelined projects along the way. He's made a category for it so you can read the
whole thing start to finish ... but I'm reading as he goes and not waiting till it's
done. Do read in order though, starting at Part 1.<br /><br />
Kate<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=9af77611-04da-4b5f-9906-db5b366144b7" /></body>
      <title>Rico Mariani and the history of Visual Studio</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=9af77611-04da-4b5f-9906-db5b366144b7</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/RicoMarianiAndTheHistoryOfVisualStudio.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:34:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Inspired by the Visual Studio Documentary, Rico Mariani is writing &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/tags/History+of+Visual+Studio/default.aspx"&gt;his
own history&lt;/a&gt;. So far he's up to 8 parts and they make for great reading. He goes
into some of the technical challenges the teams faced, and talks about cancelled and
sidelined projects along the way. He's made a category for it so you can read the
whole thing start to finish ... but I'm reading as he goes and not waiting till it's
done. Do read in order though, starting at Part 1.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Kate&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=9af77611-04da-4b5f-9906-db5b366144b7" /&gt;</description>
      <category>C++</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
      <category>Visual Studio 2008</category>
      <category>Visual Studio 2010</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=97a58992-7a76-418e-825a-48584d045c85</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=97a58992-7a76-418e-825a-48584d045c85</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
People believe a lot of strange things in this world. They worry specifically that
SharePoint won't perform as well as they need, and that they can write some sort of
ASP.NET app with a SQL backend that will somehow outperform it. I really liked <a href="http://www.binarywave.com/blogs/eshupps/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=9c93c708%2De5ce%2D4714%2Dbdea%2D499330361130&amp;ID=188">this
post from Eric Shupps </a>that lists a few of them. Keep in mind these are all myths
- that is "not true". 
</p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <ul>
          <li>
SharePoint Lists Have an Upper Limit of Two Thousand Items</li>
          <li>
SharePoint Is Just Too Slow for Common Tasks</li>
          <li>
SharePoint Is Not Suitable For Large Public-Facing Web Sites</li>
          <li>
SharePoint Isn’t A Scalable Enterprise Document Management System</li>
          <li>
SharePoint Pages Take Too Long to Render Over the WAN</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Eric goes into quite a bit of detail debunking each of these 5 myths, so if you have
a tendency to believe these things, here's a chance to get straightened out on that.
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=97a58992-7a76-418e-825a-48584d045c85" />
      </body>
      <title>Sharepoint Performance Myths</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=97a58992-7a76-418e-825a-48584d045c85</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/SharepointPerformanceMyths.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:23:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
People believe a lot of strange things in this world. They worry specifically that
SharePoint won't perform as well as they need, and that they can write some sort of
ASP.NET app with a SQL backend that will somehow outperform it. I really liked &lt;a href="http://www.binarywave.com/blogs/eshupps/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=9c93c708%2De5ce%2D4714%2Dbdea%2D499330361130&amp;amp;ID=188"&gt;this
post from Eric Shupps &lt;/a&gt;that lists a few of them. Keep in mind these are all myths
- that is "not true". 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
SharePoint Lists Have an Upper Limit of Two Thousand Items&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
SharePoint Is Just Too Slow for Common Tasks&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
SharePoint Is Not Suitable For Large Public-Facing Web Sites&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
SharePoint Isn’t A Scalable Enterprise Document Management System&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
SharePoint Pages Take Too Long to Render Over the WAN&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Eric goes into quite a bit of detail debunking each of these 5 myths, so if you have
a tendency to believe these things, here's a chance to get straightened out on that.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=97a58992-7a76-418e-825a-48584d045c85" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=327480d3-2009-41ff-94b6-0d2ddd98fb32</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=327480d3-2009-41ff-94b6-0d2ddd98fb32</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
If you do any SharePoint work, you need SharePoint Designer. If you're a developer,
you probably got it through an MSDN subscription. But is there someone in your company
who doesn't use Visual Studio and other developer tools, just some designer-oriented
ones? Now that person can have a copy of SharePoint Designer - it's become a free
product. Why? There's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvvVJamO3nQ">a video
interview </a>that explains the team's thinking on SharePoint as a platform, and making
it simpler to build around it.
</p>
        <p>
Download it <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&amp;FamilyID=baa3ad86-">here</a>,
and enjoy!
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=327480d3-2009-41ff-94b6-0d2ddd98fb32" />
      </body>
      <title>SharePoint Designer is now free</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=327480d3-2009-41ff-94b6-0d2ddd98fb32</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/SharePointDesignerIsNowFree.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:53:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
If you do any SharePoint work, you need SharePoint Designer. If you're a developer,
you probably got it through an MSDN subscription. But is there someone in your company
who doesn't use Visual Studio and other developer tools, just some designer-oriented
ones? Now that person can have a copy of SharePoint Designer - it's become a free
product. Why? There's &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvvVJamO3nQ"&gt;a video
interview &lt;/a&gt;that explains the team's thinking on SharePoint as a platform, and making
it simpler to build around it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Download it &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&amp;amp;FamilyID=baa3ad86-"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;,
and enjoy!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=327480d3-2009-41ff-94b6-0d2ddd98fb32" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=28301271-526e-420b-8856-b3009c630cfe</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=28301271-526e-420b-8856-b3009c630cfe</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
We all face times when we have a picture and we want the text. Maybe we have a printout
we can scan, but we don't have one of those cool photocopiers that scans to a true
text format like PDF or XPS. Maybe we took a screenshot during a web cast and don't
want to retype all the code. That sort of thing. There used to be OCR in Word, but
in Word 2007 it seems to have disappeared. No worries though, it resurfaced in One
Note.
</p>
        <p>
Here's a screenshot from a private web cast last summer (the actual content is in
a <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2009/02/03/rvalue-references-c-0x-features-in-vc10-part-2.aspx">recent
Visual C++ team blog</a>, so no worries about revealing super secret info):
</p>
        <p>
          <img border="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/C++ 0x examples 2.JPG" />
        </p>
        <p>
Now, I open a new One Note document, paste this jpg into it, then right-click:
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
          <img border="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/one note.jpg" />
        </p>
        <p>
You can hit paste right in One Note if you like, but it tries to capture formatting
etc. I pasted into Notepad and got this:
</p>
        <pre>Some samples<br />
structXfl;<br />
void meow(constX&amp;)cout&lt;&lt;”meowconstX&amp;):Copying.”&lt;&lt;endI;}<br />
void meow(X&amp;&amp;) cout &lt;&lt; “meow(X&amp;&amp;): Moving.’ &lt;&lt;endl;}<br />
XfooOIreturn XO;}<br />
const X bar() return X(); }<br />
mt main()<br />
Xa;<br />
constXb;<br />
meow(a); I/Copying<br />
meow(b); I/Copying<br />
meow(fooO); ii Moving<br />
meow(barO); II Copying<br />
}</pre>
        <p>
OK, it needs some spaces, and it's not too smart about {} or //, but it's quicker
than typing it all yourself. And if you have a boatload of ordinary typed text (say
a paragraph from a printed RFP that you want to quote in an email to various folks,
or a powerpoint presentation) then it's even more accurate. And it's probably on your
machine already!
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=28301271-526e-420b-8856-b3009c630cfe" />
      </body>
      <title>One Note as OCR tool</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=28301271-526e-420b-8856-b3009c630cfe</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/OneNoteAsOCRTool.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
We all face times when we have a picture and we want the text. Maybe we have a printout
we can scan, but we don't have one of those cool photocopiers that scans to a true
text format like PDF or XPS. Maybe we took a screenshot during a web cast and don't
want to retype all the code. That sort of thing. There used to be OCR in Word, but
in Word 2007 it seems to have disappeared. No worries though, it resurfaced in One
Note.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Here's a screenshot from a private web cast last summer (the actual content is in
a &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2009/02/03/rvalue-references-c-0x-features-in-vc10-part-2.aspx"&gt;recent
Visual C++ team blog&lt;/a&gt;, so no worries about revealing super secret info):
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img border=0 src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/C++ 0x examples 2.JPG"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now, I open a new One Note document, paste this jpg into it, then right-click:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img border=0 src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/one note.jpg"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You can hit paste right in One Note if you like, but it tries to capture formatting
etc. I pasted into Notepad and got this:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Some samples&lt;br&gt;
structXfl;&lt;br&gt;
void meow(constX&amp;amp;)cout&amp;lt;&amp;lt;”meowconstX&amp;amp;):Copying.”&amp;lt;&amp;lt;endI;}&lt;br&gt;
void meow(X&amp;amp;&amp;amp;) cout &amp;lt;&amp;lt; “meow(X&amp;amp;&amp;amp;): Moving.’ &amp;lt;&amp;lt;endl;}&lt;br&gt;
XfooOIreturn XO;}&lt;br&gt;
const X bar() return X(); }&lt;br&gt;
mt main()&lt;br&gt;
Xa;&lt;br&gt;
constXb;&lt;br&gt;
meow(a); I/Copying&lt;br&gt;
meow(b); I/Copying&lt;br&gt;
meow(fooO); ii Moving&lt;br&gt;
meow(barO); II Copying&lt;br&gt;
}&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
OK, it needs some spaces, and it's not too smart about {} or //, but it's quicker
than typing it all yourself. And if you have a boatload of ordinary typed text (say
a paragraph from a printed RFP that you want to quote in an email to various folks,
or a powerpoint presentation) then it's even more accurate. And it's probably on your
machine already!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=28301271-526e-420b-8856-b3009c630cfe" /&gt;</description>
      <category>C++</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=2b5da98c-1bf3-44d4-a2a1-7daaaeed4f6b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=2b5da98c-1bf3-44d4-a2a1-7daaaeed4f6b</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Anyone who blogs on technical topics soon notices they get a lot more hits if they
wander into non technical areas for a post or two. That’s just because there are more
non technical people out there, searching for tips on stain removal or coupons for
TGI Fridays, than there are people who want to know how to get a manifest on an executable
or how to write a C++/CLI wrapper for native code or what’s coming in Visual Studio
2010. That’s why my top ten posts last year are:<br /></p>
        <p>
          <strong>1 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/XPSDocumentViewer.aspx">
            <strong>XPS
Document Viewer </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– Nov 19th 2006<br /></strong>I guess people are still getting XPS documents and don’t know how to read
them. OK. Not sure why my page would be the one that over 7000 people find, but what
the heck, the information is still valid.
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>2 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/ReadingOffice2007Files.aspx">
            <strong>Reading
Office 2007 files </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– Nov 23rd 2006<br /></strong>Also from two years ago but people still need to know this. I send people
this link whenever I get one of those “I can’t read your attachment because I’m not
on Office 2007 yet” replies to an email. I didn’t send it out 4000 times though, so
I guess a lot of people are searching for this stuff.
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>3 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/TryWwwmappointcom.aspx">
            <strong>Try
Www.mappoint.com</strong>
          </a>
          <strong> – August 18th 2004</strong>
          <br />
I read recently that people don’t seem to realize they can type URLS into the address
bar on their browsers, and have their home pages set to search engines, and actually
type entire URLS into search boxes so they can click the result. I would deny this
could happen, except many years ago I had a client who did just this, so I know there
really are people who do this. I also can’t think of any other reason why over 2500
people would read a four year old post comparing MapPoint to MapQuest given that everybody
these days uses either maps.google.com or maps.live.com.
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>4 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/IntroductionToWorkflowInSharePoint2007.aspx">
            <strong>Introduction
to Workflow in SharePoint 2007 </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– June 22nd 2006<br /></strong>Yep, workflow was a hugely important addition to SharePoint. We’re loving
it in the SharePoint project we’re doing now. Again this is a topic that must surely
be better covered somewhere else though. Still almost 2500 people stopped by to learn
about workflow – I hope they followed the link to learn more, and learn something
a little more recent – say from after the product was released?
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>5 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/HowToEarnAMillionAeroplanMiles.aspx">
            <strong>How
to earn a million Aeroplan miles </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– Oct 1st 2005<br /></strong>Now this is really non-technical, but it caught my attention and I guess
plenty of other people’s too. I have some other blog entries from time to time about
Aeroplan miles, but I don’t really cover how to earn them. For that I highly recommend
Flyertalk’s <a href="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan-375/">Aeroplan
forum</a>.
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>6 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/BatchconvertVisualStudio2005ProjectsToVisualStudio2008.aspx">
            <strong>Batch-convert
Visual Studio 2005 projects to Visual Studio 2008 </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– Dec 17th
2007<br /></strong>The most recent entry yet in this top ten. It makes sense that something
that gets hits all year does better than something that wasn’t even around for the
first half of 2008. And this is a useful tip I haven’t seen many other places. All
those searching people should just subscribe to John Robbins – searching only helps
you if you know something exists and want to find it. Smart blogs like John show you
things you hadn’t imagined existing.
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>7 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/AnotherWayToGetTheShieldOnAButtonOrAnywhereElse.aspx">
            <strong>Another
Way to Get the Shield on a Button (or Anywhere Else) </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– Jan 30th
2008<br /></strong>Finally, something from 2008 in the 2008 top ten! And this is a good tip
from Daniel Moth. Remember, the shield on a menu item or button doesn’t bring up the
UAC prompt any more than putting ... on a menu item brings up a dialog. And nothing
puts the shield there for you if you trigger a prompt any more than something puts
the ... for you when it sees you have code to show a dialog. All of this is just sensible
developer tradition that helps users feel comfortable with the software they’re using.
So please play along and help people know what to expect.
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>8 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/DontCompileMFCAppsWithClrpure.aspx">
            <strong>Don't
compile MFC apps with /clr:pure </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– Jan 17th 2007<br /></strong>This one seemed like a no-brainer – MFC includes native stuff, /clr:pure
means I don’t have any native stuff, but I was getting emails asking for help and
this kept turning out to be the issue. So I blogged it. A lot of my blog topics are
the answers to random emails I get from people who are looking for help. This way
an extra 1500 or so people saw the answer in 2008.
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>9 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/HotLaptopHeresATip.aspx">
            <strong>Hot
Laptop? Here's a tip </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– May 14th 2006<br /></strong>It’s still good advice for working with an overheating laptop. I’m not sure
if the searchers all had that problem or were using “hot” more metaphorically. 
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
          <strong>10 - </strong>
          <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/AddingAManifestToAVistaApplication.aspx">
            <strong>Adding
a manifest to a Vista application </strong>
          </a>
          <strong>– Oct 3rd 2006</strong>
          <br />
This is mostly a link over to <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/cheller/archive/2006/08/24/how-to-embed-a-manifest-in-an-assembly-let-me-count-the-ways.aspx">Catherine
Heller’s Visual Studio 2005 instructions</a>, except that I really wanted to call
out how much less work it was for Visual C++ compared to C# and VB.NET. Anyway it’s
all a ton easier with Visual Studio 2008 these days. 
</p>
        <p>
          <br />
What else can I tell you from my stats? I got almost a million visits over the year,
and they averaged 2.71 requests – meaning most folks clicked around a bit once they
arrived. That’s heartening. In 2008 I set myself a goal to blog every day. I didn’t
achieve that – there were several long gaps in there – but I did post 135 times. I
still like the quote from my post on June 1st, resuming after a four-month gap: “Blogging,
like speaking at a Quaker meeting, is something one must do only if the spirit moves
one.” I’m looking forward to having my spirit move me hundreds of times in 2009.<br /></p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=2b5da98c-1bf3-44d4-a2a1-7daaaeed4f6b" />
      </body>
      <title>Most popular posts of 2008</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=2b5da98c-1bf3-44d4-a2a1-7daaaeed4f6b</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/MostPopularPostsOf2008.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:07:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Anyone who blogs on technical topics soon notices they get a lot more hits if they
wander into non technical areas for a post or two. That’s just because there are more
non technical people out there, searching for tips on stain removal or coupons for
TGI Fridays, than there are people who want to know how to get a manifest on an executable
or how to write a C++/CLI wrapper for native code or what’s coming in Visual Studio
2010. That’s why my top ten posts last year are:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;1 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/XPSDocumentViewer.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;XPS
Document Viewer &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– Nov 19th 2006&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;I guess people are still getting XPS documents and don’t know how to read
them. OK. Not sure why my page would be the one that over 7000 people find, but what
the heck, the information is still valid.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;2 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/ReadingOffice2007Files.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reading
Office 2007 files &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– Nov 23rd 2006&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Also from two years ago but people still need to know this. I send people
this link whenever I get one of those “I can’t read your attachment because I’m not
on Office 2007 yet” replies to an email. I didn’t send it out 4000 times though, so
I guess a lot of people are searching for this stuff.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;3 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/TryWwwmappointcom.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Try
Www.mappoint.com&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt; – August 18th 2004&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I read recently that people don’t seem to realize they can type URLS into the address
bar on their browsers, and have their home pages set to search engines, and actually
type entire URLS into search boxes so they can click the result. I would deny this
could happen, except many years ago I had a client who did just this, so I know there
really are people who do this. I also can’t think of any other reason why over 2500
people would read a four year old post comparing MapPoint to MapQuest given that everybody
these days uses either maps.google.com or maps.live.com.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;4 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/IntroductionToWorkflowInSharePoint2007.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction
to Workflow in SharePoint 2007 &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– June 22nd 2006&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Yep, workflow was a hugely important addition to SharePoint. We’re loving
it in the SharePoint project we’re doing now. Again this is a topic that must surely
be better covered somewhere else though. Still almost 2500 people stopped by to learn
about workflow – I hope they followed the link to learn more, and learn something
a little more recent – say from after the product was released?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;5 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/HowToEarnAMillionAeroplanMiles.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How
to earn a million Aeroplan miles &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– Oct 1st 2005&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Now this is really non-technical, but it caught my attention and I guess
plenty of other people’s too. I have some other blog entries from time to time about
Aeroplan miles, but I don’t really cover how to earn them. For that I highly recommend
Flyertalk’s &lt;a href="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan-375/"&gt;Aeroplan
forum&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;6 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/BatchconvertVisualStudio2005ProjectsToVisualStudio2008.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Batch-convert
Visual Studio 2005 projects to Visual Studio 2008 &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– Dec 17th
2007&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;The most recent entry yet in this top ten. It makes sense that something
that gets hits all year does better than something that wasn’t even around for the
first half of 2008. And this is a useful tip I haven’t seen many other places. All
those searching people should just subscribe to John Robbins – searching only helps
you if you know something exists and want to find it. Smart blogs like John show you
things you hadn’t imagined existing.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;7 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/AnotherWayToGetTheShieldOnAButtonOrAnywhereElse.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Another
Way to Get the Shield on a Button (or Anywhere Else) &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– Jan 30th
2008&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Finally, something from 2008 in the 2008 top ten! And this is a good tip
from Daniel Moth. Remember, the shield on a menu item or button doesn’t bring up the
UAC prompt any more than putting ... on a menu item brings up a dialog. And nothing
puts the shield there for you if you trigger a prompt any more than something puts
the ... for you when it sees you have code to show a dialog. All of this is just sensible
developer tradition that helps users feel comfortable with the software they’re using.
So please play along and help people know what to expect.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;8 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/DontCompileMFCAppsWithClrpure.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Don't
compile MFC apps with /clr:pure &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– Jan 17th 2007&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;This one seemed like a no-brainer – MFC includes native stuff, /clr:pure
means I don’t have any native stuff, but I was getting emails asking for help and
this kept turning out to be the issue. So I blogged it. A lot of my blog topics are
the answers to random emails I get from people who are looking for help. This way
an extra 1500 or so people saw the answer in 2008.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;9 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/HotLaptopHeresATip.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hot
Laptop? Here's a tip &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– May 14th 2006&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;It’s still good advice for working with an overheating laptop. I’m not sure
if the searchers all had that problem or were using “hot” more metaphorically. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;10 - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/AddingAManifestToAVistaApplication.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Adding
a manifest to a Vista application &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;– Oct 3rd 2006&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is mostly a link over to &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/cheller/archive/2006/08/24/how-to-embed-a-manifest-in-an-assembly-let-me-count-the-ways.aspx"&gt;Catherine
Heller’s Visual Studio 2005 instructions&lt;/a&gt;, except that I really wanted to call
out how much less work it was for Visual C++ compared to C# and VB.NET. Anyway it’s
all a ton easier with Visual Studio 2008 these days. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What else can I tell you from my stats? I got almost a million visits over the year,
and they averaged 2.71 requests – meaning most folks clicked around a bit once they
arrived. That’s heartening. In 2008 I set myself a goal to blog every day. I didn’t
achieve that – there were several long gaps in there – but I did post 135 times. I
still like the quote from my post on June 1st, resuming after a four-month gap: “Blogging,
like speaking at a Quaker meeting, is something one must do only if the spirit moves
one.” I’m looking forward to having my spirit move me hundreds of times in 2009.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=2b5da98c-1bf3-44d4-a2a1-7daaaeed4f6b" /&gt;</description>
      <category>C++</category>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>Meta</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
      <category>Vista</category>
      <category>Visual Studio 2008</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=2eb11271-0a9c-47ff-ae0e-cb376259cdb8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=2eb11271-0a9c-47ff-ae0e-cb376259cdb8</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
So is there anything you hate more than the old "Unknown Error" when you're doing
Sharepoint development? I found <a href="http://madhurahuja.blogspot.com/2008/01/reveal-unknown-error-on-sharepoint-2007.html">this
tip</a> on Madhur Ahuja's old blog (he <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mahuja/">moved
it</a> earlier this year) and it's short enough I can paste it here:
</p>
        <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          <p>
Find the web.config for the site you normally use as your development site. Locate
this tag: 
</p>
          <pre>&lt;SafeMode ... CallStack="false"&gt;</pre>and change it to CallStack="true". 
<p>
Set <code>&lt;CUSTOMERRORS mode="On"&gt;</code>to <code>mode="Off".</code></p><p>
Set <code>&lt;compilation debug="false" batch="false"&gt;</code>to <code>&lt;compilation
debug="true" batch="true"&gt;</code></p><p></p><p>
Now you will get the full stack trace as soon as the error is raised.
</p></blockquote>
        <p>
Works like a charm! Well done Madhur, and thankyou!
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=2eb11271-0a9c-47ff-ae0e-cb376259cdb8" />
      </body>
      <title>Best Sharepoint Tip Ever</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=2eb11271-0a9c-47ff-ae0e-cb376259cdb8</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/BestSharepointTipEver.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
So is there anything you hate more than the old "Unknown Error" when you're doing
Sharepoint development? I found &lt;a href="http://madhurahuja.blogspot.com/2008/01/reveal-unknown-error-on-sharepoint-2007.html"&gt;this
tip&lt;/a&gt; on Madhur Ahuja's old blog (he &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mahuja/"&gt;moved
it&lt;/a&gt; earlier this year) and it's short enough I can paste it here:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Find the web.config for the site you normally use as your development site. Locate
this tag: &lt;pre&gt;&amp;lt;SafeMode ... CallStack="false"&amp;gt;&lt;/pre&gt;and change it to CallStack="true". 
&lt;p&gt;
Set &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;CUSTOMERRORS mode="On"&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;to &lt;code&gt;mode="Off".&lt;/code&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Set &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;compilation debug="false" batch="false"&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;to &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;compilation
debug="true" batch="true"&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now you will get the full stack trace as soon as the error is raised.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Works like a charm! Well done Madhur, and thankyou!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=2eb11271-0a9c-47ff-ae0e-cb376259cdb8" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=56ca2ecf-5eab-42e0-aaae-708110a44732</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=56ca2ecf-5eab-42e0-aaae-708110a44732</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Here’s a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=4D951911-3E7E-4AE6-B059-A2E79ED87041&amp;displaylang=en">free
and useful add on for Office 2007</a>. It enables “save as PDF” from a variety of
Office products. Here’s what Save As looks like in Word 2007 now that I have it installed:
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/wordtopdf.jpg" border="0" />
        </p>
        <p>
No muss, no fuss. No products that <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/WindowsErrorReportingIsYourFriend.aspx">make
my computer hang</a> :-).
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=56ca2ecf-5eab-42e0-aaae-708110a44732" />
      </body>
      <title>Save as PDF from Office 2007</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=56ca2ecf-5eab-42e0-aaae-708110a44732</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/SaveAsPDFFromOffice2007.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Here’s a &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=4D951911-3E7E-4AE6-B059-A2E79ED87041&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;free
and useful add on for Office 2007&lt;/a&gt;. It enables “save as PDF” from a variety of
Office products. Here’s what Save As looks like in Word 2007 now that I have it installed:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/wordtopdf.jpg" border=0&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
No muss, no fuss. No products that &lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/WindowsErrorReportingIsYourFriend.aspx"&gt;make
my computer hang&lt;/a&gt; :-).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=56ca2ecf-5eab-42e0-aaae-708110a44732" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=139c5128-9206-49b0-827d-43f39619d58f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=139c5128-9206-49b0-827d-43f39619d58f</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Jon Udell <a href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/30/chris-gemignani-recreates-a-new-york-times-infographic-in-excel/">posted
recently </a>about a compelling graphic in the New York Times:
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/NYT.JPG" border="0" />
        </p>
        <p>
This is a very intruiging graph that immediately gets you thinking about survival
rates, about whether new cases are rising or falling, and the obvious contrasts between,
say, prostate and pancreatic cancers. But Jon then <a href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/30/chris-gemignani-recreates-a-new-york-times-infographic-in-excel/">goes
on </a>to link to a post about how to make graphs like this yourself featuring your
own numbers (sales? expenses? bug rates? time spent?) in Excel. I am consistent amazed
at what Excel will do for people who know what they're doing. Check it out.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=139c5128-9206-49b0-827d-43f39619d58f" />
      </body>
      <title>Persuasive graphs with Excel</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=139c5128-9206-49b0-827d-43f39619d58f</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PersuasiveGraphsWithExcel.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:54:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Jon Udell &lt;a href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/30/chris-gemignani-recreates-a-new-york-times-infographic-in-excel/"&gt;posted
recently &lt;/a&gt;about a compelling graphic in the New York Times:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/NYT.JPG" border=0&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is a very intruiging graph that immediately gets you thinking about survival
rates, about whether new cases are rising or falling, and the obvious contrasts between,
say, prostate and pancreatic cancers. But Jon then &lt;a href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/30/chris-gemignani-recreates-a-new-york-times-infographic-in-excel/"&gt;goes
on &lt;/a&gt;to link to a post about how to make graphs like this yourself featuring your
own numbers (sales? expenses? bug rates? time spent?) in Excel. I am consistent amazed
at what Excel will do for people who know what they're doing. Check it out.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=139c5128-9206-49b0-827d-43f39619d58f" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=0ab56019-a984-470b-a380-e939d055af86</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=0ab56019-a984-470b-a380-e939d055af86</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Recently I told you <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/GettingAnEvaluationCopyOfVista.aspx">how
to get a virtual image of Vista</a> for evaluation purposes. Now you can try a variety
of operating systems, applications and server products, preinstalled onto evaluation
VHDs. Try Vista, Office 2007, Visual Studio Team System, SQL Server 2005, Office Sharepoint
Server 2007, and more. Some of these products are a little tricky to get installed
and ready to go, so a virtual image is just what you need. Even if you have an MSDN
subscription, you might like to use these VHDs just for that convenience factor.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/try/vhd/default.mspx">http://www.microsoft.com/technet/try/vhd/default.mspx</a>
        </p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=0ab56019-a984-470b-a380-e939d055af86" />
      </body>
      <title>Want to evaluate server software?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=0ab56019-a984-470b-a380-e939d055af86</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/WantToEvaluateServerSoftware.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Recently I told you &lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/GettingAnEvaluationCopyOfVista.aspx"&gt;how
to get a virtual image of Vista&lt;/a&gt; for evaluation purposes. Now you can try a variety
of operating systems, applications&amp;nbsp;and server products, preinstalled onto evaluation
VHDs. Try Vista, Office 2007, Visual Studio Team System, SQL Server 2005, Office Sharepoint
Server 2007, and more. Some of these products are a little tricky to get installed
and ready to go, so a virtual image is just what you need. Even if you have an MSDN
subscription, you might like to use these VHDs just for that convenience factor.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/try/vhd/default.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/try/vhd/default.mspx&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=0ab56019-a984-470b-a380-e939d055af86" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
      <category>Vista</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=79e35031-2513-49bc-9a45-9f935cf6422a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=79e35031-2513-49bc-9a45-9f935cf6422a</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I really like Outlook 2007. I just LOVE the ToDo bar, and the searching, and the flagging
for followup and marking done, and the way the calendar looks now, and well pretty
much everything. Except one thing. I hate that Outlook Today view and I hated it before
too. Well... I just made it go away.
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/outlook options.JPG" border="0" />
        </p>
        <p>
Tools, Options, Other tab, Advanced button, click the Browse next to "Startup in this
folder" ... and no more Outlook Today when Outlook first starts up. Simple, but so
satisfying!
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=79e35031-2513-49bc-9a45-9f935cf6422a" />
      </body>
      <title>Outlook Today, please go away</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=79e35031-2513-49bc-9a45-9f935cf6422a</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/OutlookTodayPleaseGoAway.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:47:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I really like Outlook 2007. I just LOVE the ToDo bar, and the searching, and the flagging
for followup and marking done, and the way the calendar looks now, and well pretty
much everything. Except one thing. I hate that Outlook Today view and I hated it before
too. Well... I just made it go away.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/outlook options.JPG" border=0&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Tools, Options, Other tab, Advanced button, click the Browse next to "Startup in this
folder" ... and no more Outlook Today when Outlook first starts up. Simple, but so
satisfying!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=79e35031-2513-49bc-9a45-9f935cf6422a" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=84787cc8-48ca-4806-9e89-bcc3760d6959</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=84787cc8-48ca-4806-9e89-bcc3760d6959</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
The Regional Director program truly is worldwide -- about half of the 120 or so of
us are located outside the USA. So let's say you want some pictures of Microsoft software
in beautiful locations around the world, what better group to ask? The program asked
us to send in pictures this fall, and here's the result:
</p>
        <a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/myvistamyofficecollage-hi-res.jpg" border="0">
          <img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/myvistamyofficesmall.jpg" border="0" />
          <br />
(larger version)</a>
        <p>
Amazing, aren't we? For my picture, which is nowhere near as spectacular as some,
I went and stood among some turning leaves.
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=84787cc8-48ca-4806-9e89-bcc3760d6959" />
      </body>
      <title>My Vista, My Office</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=84787cc8-48ca-4806-9e89-bcc3760d6959</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/MyVistaMyOffice.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Regional Director program truly is worldwide -- about half of the 120 or so of
us are located outside the USA. So let's say you want some pictures of Microsoft software
in beautiful locations around the world, what better group to ask? The program asked
us to send in pictures this fall, and here's the result:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/myvistamyofficecollage-hi-res.jpg" border="0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/myvistamyofficesmall.jpg" border=0&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(larger version)&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Amazing, aren't we? For my picture, which is nowhere near as spectacular as some,
I went and stood among some turning leaves.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=84787cc8-48ca-4806-9e89-bcc3760d6959" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Canadian Colour</category>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>RD</category>
      <category>Travel</category>
      <category>Vista</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=056411a7-e7f7-44fb-975f-22b52a169871</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=056411a7-e7f7-44fb-975f-22b52a169871</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Has someone sent you a .docx file yet? That's the Word 2007 file format.  (The
new Excel format is .xlsx, the new Powerpoint is .pptx, and so on.) The first time
I tried to open one with Word 2003, I got a helpful dialog offering to get and install
the converter for me, and I did, and now I can move the files back and forth around
my network without concern. But a few people have mentioned to me that they didn't
get this helpful dialog. You can <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/beta/converter.mspx">hand-download
and install the converter </a>from the Office preview site. Make sure you are up to
date on Office Service Packs... there are links from the download page. And though
the converter says it's for the Technical Refresh 2, it has worked fine for me on
files created with earlier betas.
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=056411a7-e7f7-44fb-975f-22b52a169871" />
      </body>
      <title>Reading Office 2007 files</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=056411a7-e7f7-44fb-975f-22b52a169871</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/ReadingOffice2007Files.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Has someone sent you a .docx file yet? That's the Word 2007 file format.&amp;nbsp; (The
new Excel format is .xlsx, the new Powerpoint is .pptx, and so on.) The first time
I tried to open one with Word 2003, I got a helpful dialog offering to get and install
the converter for me, and I did, and now I can move the files back and forth around
my network without concern. But a few people have mentioned to me that they didn't
get this helpful dialog. You can &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/beta/converter.mspx"&gt;hand-download
and install the converter &lt;/a&gt;from the Office preview site. Make sure you are up to
date on Office Service Packs... there are links from the download page.&amp;nbsp;And though
the converter says it's for the Technical Refresh 2, it has worked fine for me on
files created with earlier betas.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=056411a7-e7f7-44fb-975f-22b52a169871" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=a6845bc9-cc43-4142-a204-f649d0616d1b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=a6845bc9-cc43-4142-a204-f649d0616d1b</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
XPS is a new document format. Office 2007 uses it, and your applications can use it
too. Under the hood, an XPS document is just a zip file of many XML files and some
binary resources (such as images.) The <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/default.mspx">Microsoft
XPS page </a>says:
</p>
        <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          <p class="blurb">
Microsoft has integrated XPS-based technologies into the 2007 Microsoft Office system
and the Microsoft Windows Vista operating system, but XPS itself is platform independent,
openly published, and available royalty-free. Microsoft is using XPS to bring additional
document value to its customers, its partners, and the computing industry.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
Since XPS documents describe layout and rendering as well as just content, you can
think of them a lot like PDF files. As a result they're likely to show up on web sites
or to be emailed to you. If you haven't yet moved up to Vista/Office 2007/IE7 you
may not know what to do with them.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/viewxps.mspx">
            <img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/downloadxpsviewer.gif" border="0" />
          </a>
        </p>
        <p>
The solution is a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/viewxps.mspx">free XPS
viewer</a>. It's up to you whether you want it integrated into IE6 -- I got the standalone
viewer from the XPS Essentials. Took only a minute or so to download and install,
and I didn't even have to reboot. Get it and be one of the cool kids again.
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=a6845bc9-cc43-4142-a204-f649d0616d1b" />
      </body>
      <title>XPS Document Viewer</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=a6845bc9-cc43-4142-a204-f649d0616d1b</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/XPSDocumentViewer.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
XPS is a new document format. Office 2007 uses it, and your applications can use it
too. Under the hood, an XPS document is just a zip file of many XML files and some
binary resources (such as images.) The &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/default.mspx"&gt;Microsoft
XPS page &lt;/a&gt;says:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt; 
&lt;p class=blurb&gt;
Microsoft has integrated XPS-based technologies into the 2007 Microsoft Office system
and the Microsoft Windows Vista operating system, but XPS itself is platform independent,
openly published, and available royalty-free. Microsoft is using XPS to bring additional
document value to its customers, its partners, and the computing industry.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Since XPS documents describe layout and rendering as well as just content, you can
think of them a lot like PDF files. As a result they're likely to show up on web sites
or to be emailed to you. If you haven't yet moved up to Vista/Office 2007/IE7 you
may not know what to do with them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/viewxps.mspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/downloadxpsviewer.gif" border=0&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The solution is a &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/viewxps.mspx"&gt;free XPS
viewer&lt;/a&gt;. It's up to you whether you want it integrated into IE6 -- I got the standalone
viewer from the XPS Essentials. Took only a minute or so to download and install,
and I didn't even have to reboot. Get it and be one of the cool kids again.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=a6845bc9-cc43-4142-a204-f649d0616d1b" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Vista</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=435d99d4-3bcc-4780-8373-1d24cc4baba4</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=435d99d4-3bcc-4780-8373-1d24cc4baba4</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Microsoft's Developer Division is really taking this transparency thing seriously.
First it opened much of the spec for Orcas, the next version of Visual Studio, to
the MVPs, and now it's <a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa948851.aspx">opening
it to the public</a>. Seriously! And not only that, but they're asking you how you
feel about these features:
</p>
        <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          <p>
Which features do you think are important? Are we making the wrong assumptions about
how you will use Visual Studio and .NET? Are we forgetting about your scenario?
</p>
          <p>
This page lists specifications for Visual Studio and .NET "Orcas". These specifications
document the new features you will find in CTP's and provide an opportunity for you
to give feedback. Please remember, some features specified below may be cut and others
may be significantly altered. We'd love your feedback to help us with this decision
process. Your feedback will be delivered into our bug database and shared with the
feature team. The team will use your feedback to develop the specification or make
improvements to future releases of Visual Studio.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
So how important is STL/CLR to you? Or friend templates? Read the specs and scenarios,
try them out in the September CTP, then speak up!
</p>
        <p>
There are two things you should know about these documents. First, they can be quite
large. The STL/CLR one is 38 pages. Second, they're XPS. On my Vista development machine,
with IE7 and Office 2007, I just click to read them. On my XP machine with IE6 and
Office 2003, it's not so seamless. Time to get me an XPS document viewer for the laptop.
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=435d99d4-3bcc-4780-8373-1d24cc4baba4" />
      </body>
      <title>What will be in the next version of Visual Studio (Orcas) ?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=435d99d4-3bcc-4780-8373-1d24cc4baba4</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/WhatWillBeInTheNextVersionOfVisualStudioOrcas.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:40:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft's Developer Division is really taking this transparency thing seriously.
First it opened much of the spec for Orcas, the next version of Visual Studio, to
the MVPs, and now it's &lt;a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa948851.aspx"&gt;opening
it to the public&lt;/a&gt;. Seriously! And not only that, but they're asking you how you
feel about these features:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Which features do you think are important? Are we making the wrong assumptions about
how you will use Visual Studio and .NET? Are we forgetting about your scenario?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This page lists specifications for Visual Studio and .NET "Orcas". These specifications
document the new features you will find in CTP's and provide an opportunity for you
to give feedback. Please remember, some features specified below may be cut and others
may be significantly altered. We'd love your feedback to help us with this decision
process. Your feedback will be delivered into our bug database and shared with the
feature team. The team will use your feedback to develop the specification or make
improvements to future releases of Visual Studio.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
So how important is STL/CLR to you? Or friend templates? Read the specs and scenarios,
try them out in the September CTP, then speak up!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There are two things you should know about these documents. First, they can be quite
large. The STL/CLR one is 38 pages. Second, they're XPS. On my Vista development machine,
with IE7 and Office 2007, I just click to read them. On my XP machine with IE6 and
Office 2003, it's not so seamless. Time to get me an XPS document viewer for the laptop.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=435d99d4-3bcc-4780-8373-1d24cc4baba4" /&gt;</description>
      <category>C++</category>
      <category>MVP</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
      <category>Vista</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=17146fcb-ffad-4c67-bc7a-62c9fa61c98d</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=17146fcb-ffad-4c67-bc7a-62c9fa61c98d</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Jan Tielens <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/jan/archive/2006/06/13/YASR_3A00_-Alerts-in-SharePoint-2007.aspx">points
out </a>a big relief in the next version of SharePoint: setting up alerts for someone
other than yourself. I faced this need many times and adapted one of the many web
part samples available online to allow administrators to set up alerts for other users. 
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/alertthem.jpg" border="0" />
        </p>
        <p>
Little things like this are going to dramatically reduce the number of web parts I
have to write. And I like that!
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=17146fcb-ffad-4c67-bc7a-62c9fa61c98d" />
      </body>
      <title>Alert Them - easy in SharePoint 2007</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=17146fcb-ffad-4c67-bc7a-62c9fa61c98d</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/AlertThemEasyInSharePoint2007.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 18:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Jan Tielens &lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/jan/archive/2006/06/13/YASR_3A00_-Alerts-in-SharePoint-2007.aspx"&gt;points
out &lt;/a&gt;a big relief in the next version of SharePoint: setting up alerts for someone
other than yourself. I faced this need many times and adapted one of the many web
part samples available online to allow administrators to set up alerts for other users. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/content/binary/alertthem.jpg" border=0&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Little things like this are going to dramatically reduce the number of web parts I
have to write. And I like that!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=17146fcb-ffad-4c67-bc7a-62c9fa61c98d" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=f006f3c1-09fc-409b-9aa1-ebfecbc0b639</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=f006f3c1-09fc-409b-9aa1-ebfecbc0b639</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Visual Studio Tools for Office (VSTO) is a bit of a funny creature. It needs to adapt
with each release of Office, and also with each release of Visual Studio. The next
version is code named Cypress and it works with either Visual Studio 2005 or with <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/future/">Orcas</a>,
and with <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/future/">Office 2007</a>. Charles
Sterling blogged <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/charles_sterling/archive/2006/06/08/621841.aspx">the
announcement </a>just before TechEd:
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in">
          <em>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Cypress</span>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> will
include the following functionality and release at about the same time as Office 2007:</span>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in">
          <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
            <em>
            </em>
          </span> 
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in">
          <em>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Symbol">
              <span>·<span style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">    </span></span>
            </span>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Application-level
add-ins for the most popular Office applications including Outlook, Excel, Word, PowerPoint,
InfoPath and Visio.<span>  </span>This is currently the #1 most requested feature
for VSTO – safe loading, unloading, and management of managed add-ins.<span>  </span>I’m
thrilled that we’re going to be able to provide this functionality to developers much
earlier than anticipated.</span>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in">
          <em>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Symbol">
              <span>·<span style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">    </span></span>
            </span>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Office
key feature support: programming model and runtime support for Ribbon, Custom Task
Panes, and Outlook forms regions.  Office’s new UI contains exciting extensibility
opportunities and Cypress will enable VSTO’s simple coding experiences like IntelliSense.<span>  </span></span>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in">
          <em>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Symbol">
              <span>·<span style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">   </span></span>
            </span>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Maintainability
and compatibility are core principles for the VSTO team and Cypress will also ensure
that your applications built on Office 2003 with VSTO 2005 continue to run with Office
2007.<span>  </span></span>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in">
          <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
            <em>
            </em>
          </span> 
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in">
          <em>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Cypress</span>
            <span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> is
an add-on and is incremental.<span>  </span>It is not, itself a complete Visual
Studio product release.<span>  </span>Anyone who has a licensed version of Visual
Studio 2005 will be eligible to download Cypress for free.<span>  </span>However,
I want to be clear that Cypress is not a super-set of all the VSTO 2005 functionality
that was made available for Office 2003 replicated for Office 2007.<span>  </span>As
promised, Excel Workbook and Word Document project support for Office 2007 will come
on-line in VSTO “Orcas”, and be made available in upcoming “Orcas” CTPs.<span>   </span>Also
look for the exciting new VSTO “Orcas” functionality, such as the visual designers
for the Ribbon and Custom Task Panes, and Outlook in these “Orcas” CTPs.</span>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p>
There's a <a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=201396">Channel 9
video </a>in which KD Hallman and Eric Carter discuss features and goals of Cypress
and beyond that's a pretty good starting point.
</p>
        <p>
If you can stand the endless rounds of public betas, <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/future/ctp_downloads/default.aspx">CTPs</a>,
and trying to work out which versions need each other or conflict with each other,
you can have a lot of fun this summer! 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=f006f3c1-09fc-409b-9aa1-ebfecbc0b639" />
      </body>
      <title>VSTO - what's next?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=f006f3c1-09fc-409b-9aa1-ebfecbc0b639</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/VSTOWhatsNext.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:33:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Visual Studio Tools for Office (VSTO) is a bit of a funny creature. It needs to adapt
with each release of Office, and also with each release of Visual Studio. The next
version is code named Cypress and it works with either Visual Studio 2005 or with &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/future/"&gt;Orcas&lt;/a&gt;,
and with &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/future/"&gt;Office 2007&lt;/a&gt;. Charles
Sterling blogged &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/charles_sterling/archive/2006/06/08/621841.aspx"&gt;the
announcement &lt;/a&gt;just before TechEd:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;Cypress&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt; will
include the following functionality and release at about the same time as Office 2007:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in"&gt;
&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Symbol"&gt;&lt;span&gt;·&lt;span style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;Application-level
add-ins for the most popular Office applications including Outlook, Excel, Word, PowerPoint,
InfoPath and Visio.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;This is currently the #1 most requested feature
for VSTO – safe loading, unloading, and management of managed add-ins.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;I’m
thrilled that we’re going to be able to provide this functionality to developers much
earlier than anticipated.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Symbol"&gt;&lt;span&gt;·&lt;span style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;Office
key feature support: programming model and runtime support for Ribbon, Custom Task
Panes, and Outlook forms regions.&amp;nbsp; Office’s new UI contains exciting extensibility
opportunities and Cypress will enable VSTO’s simple coding experiences like IntelliSense.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Symbol"&gt;&lt;span&gt;·&lt;span style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;Maintainability
and compatibility are core principles for the VSTO team and Cypress will also ensure
that your applications built on Office 2003 with VSTO 2005 continue to run with Office
2007.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in"&gt;
&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;Cypress&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt; is
an add-on and is incremental.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;It is not, itself a complete Visual
Studio product release.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Anyone who has a licensed version of Visual
Studio 2005 will be eligible to download Cypress for free.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;However,
I want to be clear that Cypress is not a super-set of all the VSTO 2005 functionality
that was made available for Office 2003 replicated for Office 2007.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;As
promised, Excel Workbook and Word Document project support for Office 2007 will come
on-line in VSTO “Orcas”, and be made available in upcoming “Orcas” CTPs.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Also
look for the exciting new VSTO “Orcas” functionality, such as the visual designers
for the Ribbon and Custom Task Panes, and Outlook in these “Orcas” CTPs.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There's a &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=201396"&gt;Channel 9
video &lt;/a&gt;in which KD Hallman and Eric Carter discuss features and goals of Cypress
and beyond that's a pretty good starting point.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If you can stand the endless rounds of public betas, &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/future/ctp_downloads/default.aspx"&gt;CTPs&lt;/a&gt;,
and trying to work out which versions need each other or conflict with each other,
you can have a lot of fun this summer! 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=f006f3c1-09fc-409b-9aa1-ebfecbc0b639" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=525d98fd-9fc1-4507-b9a5-4d94e357a354</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=525d98fd-9fc1-4507-b9a5-4d94e357a354</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
One of the huge holes in the current version of SharePoint is workflow. If you have
a document that starts out as a draft, and then the author decides it's ready to be
approved, and then someone approves it and it goes to a more public status, that's
workflow. And it's not supported in the SharePoint (either WSS or SPS) you can "buy"
today. (WSS is free with Windows Server 2003, so I put "buy" in quotes.) 
</p>
        <p>
This hole is going to be fixed in the next version of SharePoint. The team has a blog
and has posted <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/archive/2006/06/07/621210.aspx">a
quick summary </a>of what workflow will be like and just how much will come to you
"out of the box." Check this list:
</p>
        <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          <p>
            <font face="Garamond">To help people get started with scenarios like these, we’ve
taken some common processes we’ve seen in our research and built those workflows into
SharePoint Server 2007 out-of-the-box for people to use without IT involvement.These <b>out-of-the-box
workflows</b> include:</font>
          </p>
          <font face="Garamond">
            <ul>
              <li>
                <b>Approval:</b> Routes a document for approval. Approvers can approve or reject the
document, reassign the approval task, or request changes to the document. 
</li>
              <li>
                <b>Collect Feedback:</b> Routes a document for review. Reviewers can provide feedback,
which is compiled and sent to the document owner when the workflow has completed. 
</li>
              <li>
                <b>Collect Signatures:</b> Gathers signatures needed to complete an Office document.
This workflow can be started only from within an Office client. 
</li>
              <li>
                <b>Disposition Approval:</b> Manages document expiration and retention by allowing
participants to decide whether to retain or delete expired documents. 
</li>
              <li>
                <b>Group Approval:</b> Similar to the Approval workflow, but uses a designated document
library and offers a personalized view of the approval process(es) in which a user
is participating. This workflow provides a hierarchical organization chart from which
to select the approvers and allows the approvers to use a stamp control instead of
a signature. This solution was designed specifically for East Asian Markets. 
</li>
              <li>
                <b>Translation Management:</b> Manages document translation by creating copies of
the document to be translated and assigning translation tasks to translators. 
</li>
              <li>
                <b>Issue Tracking:</b> Manages the issue tracking process by creating tasks for Active
issues assigned to users who own to a given issue. When the task related to an issue
is complete hence resolving the issue, the creator of the issue is assigned a review
task so that the issue can be closed.</li>
            </ul>
          </font>
        </blockquote>
        <p dir="ltr">
          <font face="Verdana">Think about what you will be able to take care of with this!
Do you want <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/beta/getthebeta.mspx">the
beta</a>? Of course you do. And there's a whole new <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ecm/">Enterprise
Content Management blog</a> to talk about all of this in greater detail, too.</font>
        </p>
        <p dir="ltr">
          <font face="Verdana">Kate</font>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=525d98fd-9fc1-4507-b9a5-4d94e357a354" />
      </body>
      <title>Introduction to Workflow in SharePoint 2007</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=525d98fd-9fc1-4507-b9a5-4d94e357a354</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/IntroductionToWorkflowInSharePoint2007.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
One of the huge holes in the current version of SharePoint is workflow. If you have
a document that starts out as a draft, and then the author decides it's ready to be
approved, and then someone approves it and it goes to a more public status, that's
workflow. And it's not supported in the SharePoint (either WSS or SPS) you can "buy"
today. (WSS is free with Windows Server 2003, so I put "buy" in quotes.) 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This hole is going to be fixed in the next version of SharePoint. The team has a blog
and has posted &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/archive/2006/06/07/621210.aspx"&gt;a
quick summary &lt;/a&gt;of what workflow will be like and just how much will come to you
"out of the box." Check this list:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font face=Garamond&gt;To help people get started with scenarios like these, we’ve taken
some common processes we’ve seen in our research and built those workflows into SharePoint
Server 2007 out-of-the-box for people to use without IT involvement.These &lt;b&gt;out-of-the-box
workflows&lt;/b&gt; include:&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;font face=Garamond&gt; 
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Approval:&lt;/b&gt; Routes a document for approval. Approvers can approve or reject the
document, reassign the approval task, or request changes to the document. 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Collect Feedback:&lt;/b&gt; Routes a document for review. Reviewers can provide feedback,
which is compiled and sent to the document owner when the workflow has completed. 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Collect Signatures:&lt;/b&gt; Gathers signatures needed to complete an Office document.
This workflow can be started only from within an Office client. 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Disposition Approval:&lt;/b&gt; Manages document expiration and retention by allowing
participants to decide whether to retain or delete expired documents. 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Group Approval:&lt;/b&gt; Similar to the Approval workflow, but uses a designated document
library and offers a personalized view of the approval process(es) in which a user
is participating. This workflow provides a hierarchical organization chart from which
to select the approvers and allows the approvers to use a stamp control instead of
a signature. This solution was designed specifically for East Asian Markets. 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Translation Management:&lt;/b&gt; Manages document translation by creating copies of
the document to be translated and assigning translation tasks to translators. 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Issue Tracking:&lt;/b&gt; Manages the issue tracking process by creating tasks for Active
issues assigned to users who own to a given issue. When the task related to an issue
is complete hence resolving the issue, the creator of the issue is assigned a review
task so that the issue can be closed.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p dir=ltr&gt;
&lt;font face=Verdana&gt;Think about what you will be able to take care of with this! Do
you want &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/beta/getthebeta.mspx"&gt;the
beta&lt;/a&gt;? Of course you do. And there's a whole new &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ecm/"&gt;Enterprise
Content Management blog&lt;/a&gt; to talk about all of this in greater detail, too.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir=ltr&gt;
&lt;font face=Verdana&gt;Kate&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=525d98fd-9fc1-4507-b9a5-4d94e357a354" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=ac4348ab-62d8-44c4-8a9d-81381d97d89e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=ac4348ab-62d8-44c4-8a9d-81381d97d89e</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Jensen Harris, in his excellent <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/">Office User
Interface blog</a>, reveals the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/archive/2005/11/07/489864.aspx">top
5 commands </a>(most frequently used) in Word:
</p>
        <ol>
          <li>
            <b>Paste</b>
          </li>
          <li>
            <b>Save</b>
          </li>
          <li>
            <b>Copy</b>
          </li>
          <li>
            <b>Undo</b>
          </li>
          <li>
            <b>Bold</b>
          </li>
        </ol>
        <p>
Doesn't surprise me at all. Cut and Copy probably add up to the almost same as paste
(in most cases any given thing is only pasted once, but of course it might have been
copied in another application and then pasted into Word) but they split the vote.
The popularity of Undo (which one of my nontechnical friends calls the "Bite Me" key)
is a testament to all the times Word is being "helpful" as I type. Man I hate software
that thinks it's smarter than me. Apparently a lot of folks do. Or perhaps a lot of
folks change their minds a lot, or mis-click a lot. 
</p>
        <p>
What I think is cool, given that this data was gathered from users who are keyboardy
and mousy, context menu users (right-clickers) and regular menu users, experienced
and novice, etc, is that every one of these commands is a one-hand chord on the keyboard:
</p>
        <ol>
          <li>
            <b>Paste</b> Ctrl-V 
</li>
          <li>
            <b>Save</b>  Ctrl-S 
</li>
          <li>
            <b>Copy</b>  Ctrl-C 
</li>
          <li>
            <b>Undo</b>  Ctrl-Z 
</li>
          <li>
            <b>Bold</b>  Ctrl-B</li>
        </ol>
        <p>
Now you see why not being able to use that left Ctrl key made things so difficult
when my laptop was being flaky.
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=ac4348ab-62d8-44c4-8a9d-81381d97d89e" />
      </body>
      <title>Top 5 Word commands</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=ac4348ab-62d8-44c4-8a9d-81381d97d89e</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Top5WordCommands.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Jensen Harris, in his excellent &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/"&gt;Office User
Interface blog&lt;/a&gt;, reveals the &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/archive/2005/11/07/489864.aspx"&gt;top
5 commands &lt;/a&gt;(most frequently used) in Word:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Paste&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Save&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Copy&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Undo&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Bold&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Doesn't surprise me at all. Cut and Copy probably add up to the almost same as paste
(in most cases any given thing is only pasted once, but of course it might have been
copied in another application and then pasted into Word) but they split the vote.
The popularity of Undo (which one of my nontechnical friends calls the "Bite Me" key)
is a testament to all the times Word is being "helpful" as I type. Man I hate software
that thinks it's smarter than me. Apparently a lot of folks do. Or perhaps a lot of
folks change their minds a lot, or mis-click a lot. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What I think is cool, given that this data was gathered from users who are keyboardy
and mousy, context menu users (right-clickers) and regular menu users, experienced
and novice, etc, is that every one of these commands is a one-hand chord on the keyboard:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Paste&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;Ctrl-V 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Save&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Ctrl-S 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Copy&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Ctrl-C 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Undo&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Ctrl-Z 
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Bold&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Ctrl-B&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now you see why not being able to use that left Ctrl key made things so difficult
when my laptop was being flaky.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=ac4348ab-62d8-44c4-8a9d-81381d97d89e" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Consulting Life</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Trackback.aspx?guid=6bd945b1-7ef6-4467-a2ae-593678f7b8a0</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=6bd945b1-7ef6-4467-a2ae-593678f7b8a0</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Kate Gregory</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
At the PDC, we were shown what Office 12 is going to be like, and it was impressive.
But since then more announcements keep coming out about it that in many ways are more
impressive than the new user interface. (If you're thinking "what new user interface?"
you need to check out the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/default.mspx">future
Office page at MSDN</a> for details.) Apparently <a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=114757#114757">the
Channel 9 Video </a>has been insanely popular also. In some ways the Open XML formats
are more exciting than the UI , especially for developers. And now this: Office 12
- not just Word, but Excel, PowerPoint, Visio, everybody - will all know how to publish
their documents as PDF. No third party tool, no add in, it will just work. I read
about it on <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/10/01/476067.aspx">Brian
Jones' blog</a>, but there are also <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2005/oct05/10-02OfficePDF.mspx">details </a>on
that future Office page.
</p>
        <p>
Kate
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=6bd945b1-7ef6-4467-a2ae-593678f7b8a0" />
      </body>
      <title>Office 12 and PDF</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=6bd945b1-7ef6-4467-a2ae-593678f7b8a0</guid>
      <link>http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/Office12AndPDF.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:53:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
At the PDC, we were shown what Office 12 is going to be like, and it was impressive.
But since then more announcements keep coming out about it that in many ways are more
impressive than the new user interface. (If you're thinking "what new user interface?"
you need to check out the &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/default.mspx"&gt;future
Office page at MSDN&lt;/a&gt; for details.) Apparently &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=114757#114757"&gt;the
Channel 9 Video &lt;/a&gt;has been insanely popular also. In some ways the Open XML formats
are more exciting than the UI , especially for developers. And now this: Office 12
- not just Word, but Excel, PowerPoint, Visio, everybody - will all know how to publish
their documents as PDF. No third party tool, no add in, it will just work. I read
about it on &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/10/01/476067.aspx"&gt;Brian
Jones' blog&lt;/a&gt;, but there are also &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2005/oct05/10-02OfficePDF.mspx"&gt;details &lt;/a&gt;on
that future Office page.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kate
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.gregcons.com/KateBlog/aggbug.ashx?id=6bd945b1-7ef6-4467-a2ae-593678f7b8a0" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Meta</category>
      <category>Office 2003</category>
      <category>Seen and Recommended</category>
      <category>Office 12 and VSTO</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>